Feb 242011
 

Thomas MacEntee at geneabloggers.com has posted an interesting reflection (“The RootsTech Revolution – Woodstock or Waterloo?”) on the aftermath of RootsTech.  Thomas raises an important question:  will our Woodstock (“A bend in the road. A light in the tunnel. A happening”) become our Waterloo (not working “on our action plans, our methods of implementing what was learned [to turn] these concepts into actual products and services”)?

I did not attend RootsTech, but have been interested in the many, many blogs about the event and its effect on our genealogical sub-culture.  Thomas MacEntee’s post has caused me to reflect on what I see happening as a result of RootsTech.  I would agree that RootsTech seems to have been a demarcation point for contemporary genealogy.  I would describe the demarcation as being almost a paradigm shift.

Since I began blogging just over a year ago, there has been a rising tide of change in the genealogy world – the number of bloggers listed on Genealbloggers.com has almost doubled…  FamilySearch has radically shifted its profile as it continues to roll out a new web presence…  Ancestry.com continues to grow by acquiring subsidiary firms, as well as the public offering of its stock…  “Who Do You Think You Are?” has become a Friday night success in the US, now well into its second season…  BetterGedcom has brought genealogy practitioners together with genealogy technologists to seek an improved standard for sharing genealogical information…  there are increasing numbers of websites designed to help genealogists publish their family trees (with increased security)… 

It seems to me that the tension in genealogy has been between those who control access to genealogical information (Ancestry.com; Footnote.com; previous incarnation of FamilySearch; etc.] and the genealogical practitioner – from professional genealogists and family historians to hobbyists (who range from those mildly interested in tracing family lineages to those who have been bitten by the genealogy virus bug). 

Computer operating systems face a similar tension.  Microsoft Windows and Apple OS are top-down systems that have developed because the developers “know” what the user “needs.”  Microsoft and Apple have each gone their own separate ways, developing their own protocols and keeping their proprietary operating systems – that is, they control the system and sell it to you.  Developers of the software that runs within those systems must follow the protocols of the operating system.  The software programs that are developed for Microsoft and Apple are proprietary and usually must be purchased. 

There do exist alternatives to MSWindows and AppleOS.  These are radically different alternatives because they are Open Source systems, not proprietary ones.  The open source system best known to me is the Linux operating system.  I am not a computer programmer and I do not know programming code, but I have turned to Linux as my operating system of choice because it is open source.  Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source) includes the following statement about open source development:  “A main principle and practice of open source software development is peer production by bartering and collaboration.”  In the open source community “peers” may include corporate officers, program developers, vendors, and users.  As a user my input (together with that of other users and developers, etc.) has brought about changes in Linux operating systems and software programs that run within those systems.  Oh, Yes! Another nice thing about open source systems and software programs is that they tend to be free.

I think that the success of RootsTech is evidence that the genealogical practitioner is now a vital player (not just a consumer) in the continuing development of genealogy protocol and services.  While FamilySearch still is basically a top-down service, it has become much more responsive to open source “bartering and collaboration.”  This was best evidenced by the shift from an earlier abandoning of the gedcom standard to the announcement at RootsTech that FamilySearch will be reviewing and updating the gedcom standard.  The basic question to be resolved is “Will the review and updating include broad-based input and involvement by the community of genealogical practitioners.  Another way to ask the question:  “Will the work of the BetterGedcom group (organized, as I understand it, primarily by genealogical practitioners) be taken into account in any updating (or replacement) of gedcom standards by FamilySearch, FamilyTreeMaker, Legacy, RootsMagic, et al?

So, it seems to me that the genealogical ‘world’ is moving toward a better balance between the top-down providers (vendors and data providers) and the bottom-up practitioners (genealogists and family historians).  One important implication of this movement toward “bartering and collaboration” is that, if we expect to attract more younger genealogists, the field of genealogy will have to continue to move toward more collaboration.  Social networking is part of such a move.  Giving practitioners a greater voice in accessing and processing vital genealogical information is another part of such a move.  Let’s hope that we have begun that move in a significant way – a way that will not be reversed.

Oct 052010
 
I struggled for a number of years with dis-organized data. A few years ago, my son and I agreed that we would approach the storage of genealogical data via the internet – genealogy 2.0 or genealogy in the cloud. Because my son is a computer programmer, our long-range goal is to develop our own wiki-based genealogical website. Currently we are using RootsMagic4 as a desktop system and TNG 4.0 as our web-based system (http://brennerfamilytree.org). Neither one of these provide exactly what we are looking for. So, my son installed MediaWiki on our website and I began to experiment.
I first tried to develop pages for displaying the collected data for family tree individuals. I developed three pages for each individual: a Profile, a Notebook, and a Research Journal. The Profile contained a) the basic vital records for the individual – birth, marriage, family, death, military service; b) a narrative compiled from the data; c) a listing of primary sources consulted; and d) a To Do list for further research. The Notebook contained any other data gathered for the individual, including elaboration upon the vital records and transcripts of documents. The Research Journal is a pre-formatted page (a template) that provides a variety of tables to record what data has been researched for the particular individual, what has not been found, and what still remains to be searched for. These three pages provided a model for future development, but were too labor intensive to develop for each primary individual in the family tree database. We hit the wall with the issue of importing GEDCOM files into a Wiki.
I then began to explore a means for organizing research data in a Wiki format. After a number of fits and starts, I finally found a system that works well for us. The key seemed to be the development of a simple navigation tool that would allow easy access for importing, storing, cross-referencing, and accessing data for all individuals in the family tree database. The current navigation chart is:
Navigation
Templates Profile Notebook Research… Journal… Navigation Chart…
Research Files Bart Russ Research Log Index… Media Index… Citation Guide… For Further Research…
Data Files
SURNAME Brenner… Deeter… Gregg… Hill… Mieding… Smith… Spitzer… Weaver…
Record Type Baptism/Confirmation… Birth… Census… Death… Immigration/Naturalization…
Land/Deeds/Other Legal… Marriage… Military…
Other Location Files… Signature Files… Media Index…
The Templates (“Profile,” “Notebook,” and “Research Journal”) contain the MediaWiki coding to reproduce the same formatted pages for each individual. The “Navigation Chart” is the coding for the above chart, allowing for easy access when I desire to make a change or add to the system. I make sure that the Navigation Chart Template is called up for each new page created in our MediaWiki.
The Research Files contain links to research logs for me (“Bart”) and for my son (“Russ”) as well as a “Research Log Index” (a listing of records entered into the Wiki and records found but not yet entered; indexed by SURNAME-FName and data-record type (Birth / Census / etc.) The “Media Index” contains a running list of document and picture files that have been uploaded to the Wiki, stored alphabetically. The “Citation Guide” contains citation templates gathered from a variety of sources. Most helpful have been the templates for each of the Census years (with attribution to Ancestry.com, since I have a subscription to that service). These guides (written in MediaWiki code) allow me to cut and paste the primary form for many data types. “For Further Research” is our To-Do list.
The most important and useful part of this Navigation system is the links for the Data Files. I have a separate page for each of the eight primary Surnames we are researching (my four grandparents and my wife’s four grandparents). On each Surname page is found an index of cognate surnames related to that primary line in our family tree. These pages contain all the data related to individuals within that Surname family. (Married women are indexed according to the surnames of their birth family.) For each individual there is a standard template that indicates where information relating to that individual can be found by data-type. Below is the record for Lloyd Brenner, my g-grandfather.

Brenner, Lloyd (1867 – 1947)

see also, data stored in: BaptismBirth… Census Records (1900, 1920, 1930)… DeathImmigrationOther Legal… Marriage… MilitaryLocationSignatures… Media Index
1889-90 Youngstown, Ohio Directory (no image)
Ancestry.com. Youngstown, Ohio Directory, 1889-90 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2000. Original data: Youngstown, OH, 1889-90. N.H. Burch & Co., 1889. subscription database, , accessed December 2009.
The headings in blue are hotlinks that go directly to the page contain that particular type of record. The blue (with a strikethrough) indicates that no data of that type have yet been entered. Individual data on the data record pages is stored alphabetically by SURNAME-FName, organized by the primary family surnames (as described above). When new data of a previously un-used record type is entered into the Wiki, I simply remove the code that creates the strikethrough for that link.

MediaWiki code is not difficult to learn and, once learned, easily used to enter data, especially when you can cut and paste entries. After putting in the source citation for a particular document (e.g., Lloyd Brenner’s 1900 census record), MediaWiki provides a convenient way to upload the document file. Following is that record and citation – Lloyd Brenner’s name is a hotlink to access the picture of the census record; the citation begins on the next line:

Brenner, Lloyd 1900 U.S. Federal Census (Population Schedule), Youngstown, Mahoning County, Ohio, ED 71, Sheet 12, Dwelling 237, Family 249, 1008 Orange Street, Lloyd Brenner household, jpeg image, (Online: The Generations Network, Inc., 2009) [Digital scan of original records in the National Archives, Washington, DC], subscription database, , accessed February 2010.

I have found this storage and retrieval system to be exceptionally helpful, especially because of the navigation chart at the top of each Wiki page. A click on the appropriate hotlink and I can easily access the sought-after document or the location to store an appropriate record and its citation. While we set up our own Genealogy Research Wiki by adding MediaWiki to our website; I suspect that it could also be done on a site such as TiddlyWiki or other sites that provide you with a Wiki wiki presence on the web.

May 172010
 

When I receive my initial dataset from Dana (my 1st cousin, once removed) I had information that my g-g-grandfather (John Brenner) was born in Adelshofen, Baden (Germany), 10 February, 1836. An obituary in the German-language Rundschau indicated that John arrived in New York City on 19 October, 1854, after a perilous 36 day Atlantic crossing.  I was able to identify three ships that arrived in New York on that date, but John was not listed among the passengers of any of the three.  Doing a broader search, my son discovered a Johannes Brenner, age 18, arriving on the William Tell, 23 October, 1854.  The William Tell sailed fron LeHavre, France.  We subsequently discovered that John’s older brother, Conrad, had previously sailed to the US from port LeHavre.   One puzzle piece in place.

Dana had John’s parents listed as Frederich and Magdalena.  I was suspicious of those names, especially Magdalena.  There was A second John Brenner in Youngstown, Ohio.  This other John Brenner, a jeweler, arrived from Germany some years after our John.  This second John Brenner’s parents were Frederich and Magdalena.  I wondered if Dana had somehow got the parent set mixed up.  Dana’s records did indicate that a family Bible of a granddaughter of our John Brenner listed his father as “Frederick (?)” and no name was entered for his mother.

I was excited when a FamilySearch query for “Joh* Brenner” resulted in a record in the International Genealogical Index (IGI) for a christening of Johannes Brenner in the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen on 21 February, 1836 (just 11 days after his date of birth).   The father was listed as Friederich Brenner; the mother, Johanna Venninger.  Hooray!  This seems to have put a second piece in the puzzle.

A recent spate of email contacts with Arlene, a descendant of John’s brother, Conrad, helped fill in the broader family picture.   Arlene was able to find more IGI records.   Because of her diligence, I decided to do a thorough search of the IGI through FamilySearch…    I search for “Brenner” surname in Germany.  Fortunately, all the Baden records come up first (3622 records for Brenners in Baden).  I scanned through all 3622 records, looking for anything related to Adelshofen, Heildelberg, Baden.  Here’s what Arlene and I found — listed in chronological order (not in the order they were discovered):

1)  09 November 1794 – Georg Friederich Brenner is Christened at the Evangelical Church in Stuttgart, Neckarkries, Wuerttemburg.  Father: Richard Georg Brenner    Mother:  Christiana Benedikta Buehler.    (If this is John’s father, we have added one more generation to the Brenner family tree.)   Thanks, Arlene!

(Note:  the following records are all from Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.  They are the only Brenner records from Adelshofen among the 3622 records listed in the FamilySearch query.)

2)  28 November 1815 – Margaretha Elisabetha Brennerin was married to Johann Wilhelm Echlenacter at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.   (Possibly a sister to Georg Friederich???    The “in” at the end of her surname is also present on Johanna Venninger’s name in the marriage record below.  I don’t know the significance of that.  Perhaps our Brenner family; maybe, not.)

3)  05 May 1822 – Georg Friederich Brenner is married to Johanna Catarina Venningerin at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.  (Unfortunately, I was unable to find any other records for Johanna Venninger/Venningerin.  I did find the christening record for Georg Ludwig Venninger – born 18 February, 1809; christened 22 February 1809.  His parents were Johannes Venninger and Elisabetha Fleckin.  These are possibly Johanna’s parents; Georg Ludwig would be a younger brother.   If true, than John Brenner would have been named for his maternal grandfather.)

4)  01 January 1825 – Christian Michael Brenner (born: 27 December 1824) is Christened at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.    Father:  Georg Friederich Brenner    Mother: Johanna Venninger  (Conrad is John’s older brother.  When John first arrived in Ohio, he stayed with Conrad in Columbiana County, just south of Youngstown.)

5)  17 September 1826 – Johanna Elisabetha Brenner (born 07 September 1826) is Christened at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.   Father:  Georg Friederich Brenner    Mother: Johanna Venninger   (An older sister of John.)

6)  26 April 1829 – Rosina Catharina Brenner (born: 10 April 1829) was Christened at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.   Father:  Georg Frederich Brenner     Mother: Johanna Venninger    (A second older sister for John.)

7)  21 February 1836 – Johannes Brenner was Christened at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.    Father:  Friederich Brenner      Mother: Johanna Venninger     (John’s birthday – 10 February, 1836, was not given in this record.    Note: John’s father is listed without “Georg.”)

8)  31 January 1850 – Elisabeth Brenner married Christian Franck at the Evangelical Church in Adelshofen, Heidelberg, Baden.   (This is most likely Johanna Elisabetha Brenner in #5, above.)

So, Friederich  and Johanna Brenner seem to have had at least 4 children – 2 sons; 2 daughters.  Both sons emigrated to the United States.  I have not found any records indicating that the parents or the daughters left Germany.

One of these days I will go to the local FHC and order the microfilm rolls that contain these records so I can see if there is any more information available.  It looks as if my son and I are going to have to get serious about planning our genealogical expedition to Germany in the next couple of years.  We now have some indicators to help shape our continuing research.

Apr 012010
 

Thank you to TennLady at GeneNotes (on recommendation from Granny’s Genealogy) for the post on Transcript, a great application from Jacob Boerema a Dutch genealogist.  Transcript allows you to have an image file open in the upper screen while transcribing information from that image in the lower screen.  I just downloaded and installed the free program and gave it a try on a letter writted to my Dad from his Aunt Katie (for his 6th birthday).

This certainly is better than working on two separate screens or transcribing by pencil and paper.  It is all right before me on a single screen…    and it keeps me from generating more waste paper. This application will be well used.   You may want to take a look at it.  The only limitation I have found is that it is a Windows application and I will have to use it in Virtualbox on my Linux computers.

Mar 052010
 

The long-awaited event has finally arrived. NBC’s Who Do You Think You Are? aired this evening.  The promotional publicity within the genealogical community was strong.  The program did not disappoint.  Sarah Jessica Parker was aided in tracing the roots of two of her mother’s ancestors.  Of course, they are her ancestors too.   

I found myself thoroughly engrossed in the show.  The story-telling was great!  After all, isn’t story-telling what genealogy is all about?!  We search for the data so we can tell more of the story…   so we can tell the story with more color, texture, flavor, and panache.    As Sarah Jessica Parker did, we get excited when we find clues and data about our ancestors.  But something else seems to settle in when we begin to piece together the story.   When SJP returned to her mother’s home in Cincinnati to tell the stories, she asked her mother if she looked different…     She was different.  At the very end we got a clue about that difference as she said, “I am belonging.”   Genealogy is a search for where and how we belong.

Of course, I would like to have seen more of the hard work the genealogists, historians, and librarians did to discover the facts and documentation for SJP’s story.   I kept saying to my wife, “But it isn’t that easy!”   It would be nice to walk into a museum in Cincinnati and be greeted by a history professor from UCLA.  (That has never happened to me when I’ve visited the museum in the old Union Terminal in Cincinnati.) 

Kudos to Producer Lisa Kudrow and to NBC.  I look forward to the next installment.

Mar 042010
 
I have two ultra-favorite pictures related to my genealogical roots.  The first is a 4 generation picture with me sitting on my great-grandfather’s knee.  From my great-grandfather’s birth to the present (2010) is 143 years.  The picture, probably taken around 1943, covers a span of just over half that time — 76 years…  my great-granddad, Lloyd Brenner (1867-1947); my dad, Donald G. Brenner (1912 – 1990); my granddad, George H. Brenner (1888 – 1955); and me (1940 -  ). 
Some have been fortunate to trace ancestors back much farther than I have.  Recently, I found a couple of online databases that, according to their data, traced my ancestry back (through Lloyd Brenner’s wife) as far as 1160 in England.  If the data is accurate and capable of being validated, I suspect it will take me many years to confirm.  

On the other hand, I have an ancestor whose roots go back more than 28 million years.  I can’t put this ancestor in a pedigree or a family group sheet, but am fortunate to have a recently taken picture.  Even though this picture of the “Sombrero Galaxy” was taken in 2003, it represents what my ancestor looked like about 28 million years ago.

The number of ancestors which are still visible in the far reaches of the universe is stunning.  Not all are as photogenic as “Sombrero;” some, however, are even more awe-inspiring. 

Why do I consider “Sombrero” an ancestor?  It’s quite simple, really.  It took billions of years for the universe to produce the nitrogen, oxygen, complex carbohydrates, mitochondrial DNA and ribosomal RNA that led to the possibility of producing 4 generations of Brenner males sitting on a sofa in a house on High Street in Youngstown, Ohio, in 1943.  I am as much a product of the greater processes of the universe’s continuing creation as I am of direct genealogical descent from particular (multiple g-)grandparents.  Unfortunately, I’m having difficulty deciding how to enter “Sombrero” in RootsMagic 4 and I am searching for some “proof” of connection that is a little closer in time to “Sombrero” than 28 billion years later.

I think this is more than just a simple brick wall.

Feb 172010
 

 George H. Mieding (4 May 1857 – 8 June 1934) was my great-grandfather. He worked at lumber yards all his life.  He was obviously known for his tough hands.  This article appeared in the Youngstown Vindicator (December 24, 1927).

The caption reads:  “The toughest hands in Youngstown are claimed by Edward H. Mieding, 70, of 125 E. Ravenwood.  Mieding has been working with lumber for 57 years.  This year, Mieding estimates, he has handled 90,000 rough boards, but not one sliver penetrated the tough fiber of his hands.”

Not bad for 70 years old.  Don’t you just love the smile!

Feb 122010
 

My g-g-grandfather, John Brenner, was born on 10 February 1836 in Adelshofen (now Eppingen), Baden. I have in my possession a copy of a handwritten transcription of what appears to be an official letter of recommendation permitting John Brenner’s emigration from Baden at age 18. I was particularly interesting in the information giving his description:  18 yrs., 5’7″, slender, long face with healthy color, brown hair, high forehead, brown eyebrows, gray eyes, medium nose, round mouth, no beard, round chin, good teeth, no other identification marks.

The copy of the transcription came from my cousin, Dana, who did most of the early work on the Brenner family line. Unfortunately, I do not have any source information regarding the transcription or its original (undoubtedly in German). Finding the original is a new research goal to add to my growing list.

Also from my cousin were copies of two obituaries of John Brenner (one in German; one in English). Since John lived in Youngstown, Mahoning County, Ohio, from about 1856 or 1857 until his death in 1909, I would surmise at the present that the obituary in German was from the Rundschau, Wm. F. Maag, Publisher and Proprietor, 16 & 18S Phelps, 30 September 1909, since the Rundschau was published every Thursday. (Another research goal: confirm publication date and that the obituary was actually from the Rundschau. From my translation of the obituary one of the most significant sentences was: “He arrived in New York on October 19, 1854.” Now, all I had to do was find the name of the ship and the passenger.

A quick search on Ancestry.com no listing for a John Brenner (both English and German variants were searched). A search of New York Times “ship landings October 1854″ and the Immigrant Ships Transcribers Guild provided no listing of a ship landing on 19 October 1854. However, a Google search for {ship “19 October 1854″ New York} sent me to a genealogical website listing an ancestral arrival aboard the Isaac Bell in New York on 19 October 1854. The Isaac Bell sailed from Le Havre France.

I quickly learned that Le Havre, France, was a preferred embarkation port for many from the Southern German states. I also learned that there are not good passenger lists for ships leaving from Le Harve.

While I previously searched the Castle Garden site (http://castlegarden.org), my son searched the site again. We found three ships that arrived at New York on 19 October 1854 – Isaac Bell, Nelson, and Waterloo. A careful review of the passenger lists of each of the three ships did not find John Brenner We had seemingly reached a dead end. Not to be daunted, my son continued on searching the Castle Garden website. Allowing for name alterations, he searched for Jo* Br* arriving in 1854 and found one Johannes Brenner, age 18, arriving from Le Havre on the William Tell on Oct. 23.

(click on image to enlarge it)

Voila! Age matches John Brenner’s; date is close to date reported in obituary; port of departure was Le Havre. Problem solved? Not completely, but we are well on the way!

Feb 082010
 

Following my son’s recommendation, we installed MediaWiki to our website. My first challenge then was to build a wiki data display template for our family tree. I focused on John Brenner (1836-1909). my g-g-grandfather. I found my data clustering in a number of areas:

  1. Basic Vital Records (gender, birth/baptism information, death/burial information, UID)
  2. Family Group Information (parents, marriage information, spouse, children)
  3. Narrative (information gathered from official records, biographical sketches, obituaries, personal data)
  4. Notes & Sources
  5. Notebook (this became a separate Notebook page, listing additional information and narratives – census data [including 1890 Veterans Schedule & 1889-90 Youngstown Directory], German & English obituaries, biographical sketches, Civil War service & Pension Claim data, immigration)
  6. Research to do (this morphed into a separate Research Journal page: a template for tracking all information and sources about the individual – birth, marriage, death, military, immigration & naturalization, census & related data, family sources, education, employment, estate, miscellaneous. This one-stop gives a quick overview of data possessed and data not-yet-found.)

The next step (one I should have initiated long ago) was building my research log – another wiki page. This is the simplest one to develop (and, for me, the one that takes the most discipline to maintain). Each day’s work is listed under the date – name of person researched, data found, data not found, sources cited.

It didn’t take long to realize that I needed some kind of indexing system for my research log (one that would also allow me to catalogue all data that I have previously held). Actually, two indexes began to emerge: 1) a name index (organized by the surnames of the 8 lineages we are following) – all data for an individual, including the data not yet entered into an overview template (see #6, above) or listed in my research log; 2) by data type – census records (by year), birth records, baptism/confirmation records, marriage records, death records, and military records. The categories of this index will be expanded as other record types are found – for example, wills and deeds. I will also be adding a media index to contain listing of all photographs.

I only have one plastic storage case containing about a half of a standard filing cabinet of papers and original documents. Everything else is scanned and digitized (and, of course, backed up multiple times). Other family documents are still in the possession of the family members I borrowed them from. The more data I enter into our research wiki, the clearer the overall picture becomes and the easier it is to access stored data. Actually, even though I still have a ways to go, I am beginning to feel as if I were organized. Perhaps, before too many moons rise and set, I will be able to say that I am organized… except that data continues to happed. After all, that’s the genealogy way!

Feb 082010
 

A little over 30 years ago I was introduced to genealogy by Dana Jack Bode (1920-2007), my 1st cousin once removed.  Dana’s files were in notebooks.  At the time I made copies of all the pages in his BRENNER notebook:  hand-drawn, hand-written family group sheets; photos of documents, newspaper articles, and tombstones; family pictures; and a few biographical sketches transcribed from published works.  While Dana’s research was very thorough, it was lacking in source citation.   Since his death, his sisters have allowed me to scan his second BRENNER notebook (the results of his continuing research since our get together 30 years ago). 

More recently, I have received GEDCOM files from my ex-brother-in-law, John Boyer, presenting his research on my wife’s family.  John did a fairly good job of consolidating family family and citing sources for much of his work.  He also provided me with large number of media files.  Actually John and I have been trading files for a long time.  At first it was Family Tree Maker files; more recently, since I have migrated my work to RootsMagic, GEDCOMs.

In the past few years, I have begun to fill in some of the gaps in the data – especially online research on census files, death certificate and indexes.  And this all has led to the problem:  What’ll I do with all this “stuff?”   How can I organize it so it can be retrieved in an orderly fashion when needed?  and   Will this data be available in a usable way for the family after I am transformed from genealogist into ancestor?   (I still don’t even have all my data entered into RootsMagic.)

I have read many articles on organizing genealogical files.  Most of the articles, however, were written by people who think in orderly, rational categories.  I am a highly intuitive person; for me, organization happens at a much different level.   The first system I found that worked for me was Robert Ragan’s GATHER, DUMP, STORE and QUICK FIND Computer Genealogy Method. It is the first “intuitive” rather than “linear-rational” filing system I have found.   As long as I was confining myself to a desktop operation (RootsMagic), that system worked fine.

My son, Russ, is my collaborator in this genealogical venture.  Russ is the technologically proficient one.  (At one point in his life described himself as a “techno-geek.”)  He has coaxed and coached me toward a Genealogy 2.0 solution.  We had moved our data from RootsMagic to PhpGedView and later to TNG (The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding), where it now resides.   While our ultimate goal is for Russ to develop our own wiki-style program, I found myself back to the question:  What’ll I do with all this “stuff?”     This has become a critical question because “all this stuff” has become much more “stuff” than before.   We have scanned and digitized all our files.   (Actually, I have one full box of pictures and letters that was passed along to my wife’s uncle and loaned to me – all waiting to be scanned.)

Too many computers;  too many memory sticks and external storage;  too many files duplicated in too many storage folders.    With my son’s encouragement, I began to find a solution to my organizational “twilight zone” in the form of a wiki.

In my next post I will describe my wiki-solution to organizating and storing our digital files