Jul 312011
 

This week’s challenge in Randy Seaver’s Saturday Night Genealogy Fun is:
1)  Read Michael John Neill’s post 10 Signs You Have Genealogy OCD (come on, give Michael some link love).
2)  Make up any number of sentences that will add to his list of signs that you have Genealogy OCD.  From one to many, no limit!

My first inklings of genealogical OCD came after reading TennLady’s posts on OCFRD (Obsessive Compulsvie Family Research Disorder.  So I have pondered my obsessions (irrational feelings of fear and anxiety) and compulsions (uncontrollable repetitive behaviors).  I have to admit that I can’t surpass the wonderfully written SNGF response by Staats Place.   Chris Staats didn’t give us a list, instead we have a post that simply demonstrates Genealogy OCD.  Well done!

I have one obsession (fear, anxiety) to share:  morbidly afraid that I will put a period where a comma should be (or neglect to use italics in the proper place) when I cite a source.  As a result I fear being “outed” by some member of the citation police so that my genealogical research will be forever held in disrepute and discounted by all, including my family.

My compulsion (repetitive behavior) is every day searching (Ancestry.com, Heritage Quest, FamilySearch, Footnote.com, etc.) the 1910 census records of Youngstown, Mahoning, Ohio, for some evidence of my great-grandfathers’ family…   checking the same resources with the same results every day (no Lloyd and Mary Ellen Brenner).   I know, I’ve checked those records (general searches as well as reviewing each page of Youngstown census records) many times before, but maybe just one more time will find what I am looking for.

OK!  OK!  Would somebody please direct me to the Genealogy Shrink.  I need help!!!

Jul 292011
 

Recently I stumbled acorss an interesting non-genealogy blog post — “14 Expert Bloggers Sharing Their Opinions & Tips On Blogging.”  It started me thinking about what I have learned in 18 months of genea-blogging.  When I began blogging in February, 2010, I didn’t know what to expect.  I had been reading a few genealogy-related blogs and clearly heard the many invitations to begin blogging.   So, I began cautiously, not wanting to make a genea-fool of myself.  It is only recently that I have begun to realize how and why I am blogging.  My learnings (bolstered by comments from the “14 Expert Bloggers” mentioned above) are in the form of 6 Be-Attitudes.  My thanks to readers who have made comments on this post and, special thanks for the suggestions that have led to two additional be-attitudes (Be Adventuresome /  Be Happy).

  1. Be Authentic!  I have learned that I don’t have to be Randy Seaver, Dick Eastmon, DearMrytle, AncestryInsider, Cyndi Howells, or …  Those roles (and their respective blogs) are already taken. Instead, I need simply to be me.  KIM (Today’s Creative Blog) says, “Be authentic! You’ve got to be YOU!  It’s basically the same lesson our mama’s taught us.“  A blog grows out of the determination to say something in a way that only I can say it — that story about my gg-aunt Julia (Hoffman) Brenner, what I learned from reading someone else’s genealogy blog, or how my son and I collaborate on our genealogy project.
  2. Be Passionate!  If I don’t care about what I write, no one else will either.  BECKY (InfarrantlyCreative) says, “Bottom line – Blog because you love to. If blogging ever loses the joy for you then don’t be afraid to say goodbye.“  Yes, information is important.  And, the passion to collect and share that information is what genealogy is all about.  TennLady’s description of Obsessive Compulsive Family Research Disease (“Another Attack of OCFRD“) and Michael John Neill’s post (“10 Signs you have Genealogy OCD“) are indications of the passion with which so many of up approach genealogy.  JOANNA PENN (“The Creative Penn“) sums it up nicely: “write what you love to read.
  3. Be Connected!  Early on, I avoided participating in community blogging ventures.  I didn’t think I was ready.  What a mistake!  Recently, after a long hiatus that brought about a need to kick-start my blogging again, I joined Tonia’s “31 Weeks to a Better Genealogy Blog” and I have begun to participate in Randy Seavers “Saturday Night Genealogy Fun.”  Joining other bloggers in those challenges has helped open up my blog (and me!) to the greater geneabloggers’ community.  Writing a genealogy blog places one squarely in the midst of a caring, passionate, knowledgeable community of people — my genea-cousins.   I have also started leaving comments on the posts of other bloggers that I follow.  I learn from them, and apparently some of them are learning from me.
  4. Be a Learner!  As a geneablogger, I am learning blogging and genealogy as I go along.  JULES CLANCY (“StoneSoup“) suggests that we “Just jump in! The most fun is in making it up as you go along.“  I experiment with this; you give that a try.  Then, when we share our experiences, we (along with others in the geneablogosphere) learn from one another — sometimes learning what to do; sometimes, what to try to do; others, what not to do.
  5. Be There for your Readers!  “Write for your readers” was the most persistent recommendation of the 14 Expert Bloggers.  I began thinking I was writing my blog for me.  Wrong!  (Actually, I do have a private blog, just for me.)  DARYA PINO (“SummerTomato“) makes it quite clear:  “Understand that your blog is not about you. It’s about your readers, and helping them comprehend your little corner of the world. If you value your readers, respect their time, answer their questions and treat them well, they will notice and tell others about the great work you’re doing.“   44 people have signed on to “follow” my blog.  As JAMES CHARTRAND (“Men with Pens“) reminds us “Blogging is a long-term commitment to both yourself and your readers.“  So I need to understand “what they [the readers of my blog] are looking for, or what they could be looking for.” (  PARKA, “Parka Blogs“).
  6. Be Adventuresome!   Sometimes genealogy seems like a “cookie cutter” venture — that is, there are standard forms for displaying data, standard ways to cite sources, standard ways of assessing data, etc.  Greta Koehl reminds us, “don’t be afraid to try something new or different. If it doesn’t work, that’s OK, but this is how we sometimes find what works”  Sometimes it is necessary to ‘color outside the lines.’ 
  7. Be Happy!  Bobby McFerrin said it nicely in his song:  “Don’t Worry, Be Happy!”  Sheryl’s comment reminded us that it is important to “Have fun!”  She also wonders if that might be the “the same thing as being passionate”  From my perspective, genealogical passion can sometimes keep us so tensely involved in what we are doing (like trying to break down a brick wall) that we can forget for a while that genealogy is at its best when it brings joy.  (I don’t know whether that is true for professional genealogists who are working for a client.  I do know, however, that it is true for me as a passionately involved hobby genealogist / family historian.)  
  8. Be a Miracle!   This last Be-Attitude is simply a statement from LEONIE ALLEN (“Goddess Guidebook“),  “Share your gifts with the world. We need your miracles, dearest.“  Each of us has gifts to share.  Our authenticity, passion, connections, learnings, and readers all contribute to those gifts and miracles.  So…    Share!   Share!    Share!

Do you have any additional Be-Attitudes about your blogging that you would share?  I’d be delighted to hear about them.

    Jul 262011
     

    Tonia’s challenge this week is to “anaylz[e] a top genealogy blog…. simply to observe and learn from others.”
    I have chosen to review Greta Koehl’s Greta’s Genealogy Blog for the following reasons:
    • a 2011 Family Tree Magazine top 40 blog, listed in the My Family History category – “It’s personal with these bloggers, whose primary motivation is to share their ancestors with the living.”
    • Greta’s Genealogy Blog (hereafter referred to as GGB) has 248 followers listed via Google Friend Connect and 134 by NetworkedBlogs. One of the reasons for building a better genealogical blog is to increase readership. Greta has certainly found ways to do that.
    • Greta has been following my blog for some time now and has offered comments on a few occasions. While not a family cousin; she’s a genealogy cousin and, therefore, part of the family.

    In setting up this week’s challenge, Tonia cautioned us to “Be unique. Learn from others and be inspired by them, but don’t copy them.” Good advice. Unfortunately, as I have reviewed GGB, I have found so many ways that I might improve my blog, that many of them will simply be copied. After all, as it is said, “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.”
    My Learnings:

    • I like the pages with Texas and South Carolina blogs. Since most of my ancestors have Ohio roots, I will add a page that lists Ohio bloggers. (Geneabloggers.com lists 19 Ohio genealogy blogs. Since this was the first time that I looked at this feature in geneabloggers.com, I see that my blog is not listed among the Ohio genealogy blogs. I will correct that.
    • GGB not only lists the surnames that Greta is researching, but has links to posts containing those surnames. That is a nice feature that I would like to add to my listing of surnames. That will require my reviewing all my posts and making sure that I have tagged them with the appropriate surnames.
    • GGB has a page entitled “My Genealogy Toolbox.” That is a nice idea. I have kept most of my links in Google bookmarks and Tami Glatz’s RelativelyCurious Community Toolbar. Since Google is no longer supporting it bookmarks function, I have been musing about how I will keep my research links. A Research Toolbox page on this blog is one way to keep it alive. [An aside: I noted that GGB also has additional links that might be put in theToolbox listed on the main page. That demonstrates a difficulty that I am facing with all the links I want to preserve – namely, where to put them so they will be easily available and how to organize them so I don't have to go searching for them in a number of places.]
    • There were a number of ‘gadgets’ (that is Blogger’s name for them) that I found in GGB that I want to explore and/or simply add to my blog:
      • NetworkedBlogs
      • GenealogyWise, Facebook, Blogtalkradio
      • List of genealogical societies to which I belong
      • Blog posts by others that I have “starred” in Reader.
    • I reviewed the list of posts for 2011. Greta averages about 15 posts a month. She repeats a number of her own themes (for example: “Monday Memories” and “What I Learned on Wednesday”). Almost a quarter of her posts were “Follow Friday Newsletter.” These posts include links to interesting posts from other bloggers with a brief comment. (I was honored to be listed recently.) In addition, Greta has a paragraph or two summarizing “My Research Week.” What a nice touch!
    • I very much liked the concluding words on the blog’s home page: “If you see your ancestors on this blog… contact me! I am always happy to share information. My e-mail address is in my profile (the link under the section entitled “About Me”). ” My only concern about this is its placement at the bottom of the page. The lengthy list of links and archived posts put this invitation in a place where few will ever see it. I will have to think about how to add a similar invitation to my blog, but in a more readily accessible spot for readers.

    One of Tonia’s question was: “Is there anything that could be improved?” I did notice one design issue. The header on the home page only extends about 2/3 of the way across the page. The extra white space contributes nothing. Personally, I would prefer the header to span the page. This is not a major issue and it certainly does not detract from the content of GGB.

    Greta’s GGB was a delight and a pleasure to review. Greta writes in an engaging manner. I particularly enjoyed The Law and Order Method of Genealogy (2 January 2011).

    In conclusion, this was an important task. Since the primary purpose of #31WBGB is to make our blogs better, I chose the right blog to review. GGB has provided me with a lot of ideas about how I might improve my blog. Thanks, Tonia, and a special thanks to Greta!

    Jul 232011
     

    Wordle: Where I'm From

    Randy Seaver‘s Saturday Night Genealogical Fun this week is:  Write a poem about “Where I’m From” using the template found at the website http://www.swva.net/fred1st/wif.htm and share it.

    Here’s mine:

    I am from the house across from the vacant lot where the big boys played baseball,
    from Tonsiline, Maxwell House Coffee, and 1955 Ford station wagon with fins,
    and from long walks to Shady Run swimming pool.

    I am from the home where a dozen inner city high school kids stay over-night on their way to Chicago…  boys sleeping in the sun room; girls, in the dining room
    from hot water radiators adding to the human warmth of the house,
    from the aroma of coffee perking, first thing in the morning.

    I am from the snowball tree with Christmas lights,
    from dandelions and weeping willows,
    from an enclosed patio room behind the garage and a gas grill outside the door.

    I am from “International Russell Day” and “International Cheryl Day,”
    from driving to Michigan after dark,
    from Brenners and Deeters and Miedings and Smiths
    from Barthels (as surname) and Barthels (as given names).

    I am from the “you can do anything you set your mind to…”
    from “always give it your best…”
    from “I can trust you…”
    and from “I love you.”

    My deep roots are from Evangelische Kirche (in Baden), 
    more recently from Congregationalist and Presbyterian…
    from a Presbyterian seminary leading to ordination as minister of word and sacrament,

    I am from Adelshofen, Baden,
    from Youngstown, Ohio,
    from New Jersey, Missouri, Nebraska, and South Dakota,
    from bean soup (yecchh!) and rinkum-ditty (yummmm!) but, most of all,
    from lots of corn on the cob, sliced tomatoes, and creamy cucumbers.

    I’m from a family of stronger women and weaker men (or so I thought)
    from a Dad who could have been the poster boy for “still waters run deep,”
    from a Mom who accomplished more in the last 30 years of her life (and is still going at 95) than most of us have in our first 60 or 70 years

    I am from more mementos located in the heart, than in the hardware…
    from more openness and possibility that is ahead, than from collectibles from the past,
    from a lifetime of experiences that can only be described (in the words of the Mastercard commercials) as “priceless.”

    I am from Stardust and Pecan Sandies and the power of Niagara Falls…
    I am from the fossil skeleton of Lucy, from the Way of Jesus, from the wisdom of Einstein…
    I am from the heart of the cosmos and the soul of Don and Garnet…
    And I am standing next to you my sister, my brother.

    Great fun!  Thanks, Randy.   I think I will ask the rest of the family to give it a whirl!

    Jul 232011
     

    My recent post (6 Types of Genealogical Collaboration) received a few comments that prompted this follow-up post. 

    Heather Rojo reminded me of a rather basic reality, “there would be no genealogy for me without lots of collaboration.”  Collaboration is endemic to the genealogical process.  Greta Koehl elaborated on that idea suggesting that, “[even when] I have no one with whom to collaborate, the genealogy blogging community fills that role by providing feedback on my research posts”  The genealogy “community” is present in geneabloggers, software user groups, local/regional/national genealogical societies, surname groups, professional associations, and many more forms.

    Randy Seaver asked a probing question “Where would you classify collaboration through a wiki like WeRelate.org or WikiTree.com? It could be many people contributing one or two things each, so it’s not necessarily one-on-one.”   (Engineers ask good organizational and structural questions!) I did not include online family trees and wikis because I have not yet shared my data in this manner.  (I am in the process of provide source citations so that, when shared in one or more online projects, my data will demonstrate some level of reliability.)    This necessitates expanding my 6 Types by adding a 7th –

    7.  One-to-Many / Many-to-One Collaboration  (we share in a research project that is bigger than any of us)    Online family trees and wikis are collaborative research projects.  They accept input from whoever chooses to register.  Much conversation continues in the genealogy blogosphere about the validity and value of the un-sourced data that is provided.  Of course, the key to any genealogical collaboration is the validity and value of the shared data.  Hopefully, this concern encourages two responses:  1) ensure that you have validated the data you share and provide a means (source citation) for others to check it out    and    2) don’t accept someone else’s data as “gospel” unless you have checked it out.   As I said in my first post on Genealogical Collaboration, I do not believe that genealogical research is necessarily done faster if done collaboratively.  In my experience, collaboration tends to slow down the process.  The benefit, however, is that collaborative genealogical research will likely provide a result that is of higher quality.

    Jul 222011
     

    Tonia’s challenge this week’s was to choose one or more from a list of 11 ways to promote a blog post “that you’ve never done before and use it to promote one of your posts.”

    My blog post was “6 Types of Genealogical Collaboration,”  a follow-up to a previous post (#8 on Tonia’s list) with an internal link to that previous post (#4).  I listed it on my Facebook page and to my Google+ genealogy circle (#2).  Since the original idea for a post on genealogical collaboration came from Dean Richardson Genlighten newsletter, with follow-up email conversation with Cindy Richardson, I sent them an email with a link to the new post (#1).  This morning I discovered that the latest Genlighten newsletter mentions both posts, includes links, and encourages their readers to “check them out.”

    At the end of the post, I wrote: “How do you collaborate with others?  What does your genealogical collaboration look like?  I’d be interested in hearing from you.”   So far, two comments list both the readers’ joy of collaborating and specific ways of collaborating.  One comment raises a question about how to categorize participation in online family trees.  I will probably respond to that last comment with a new post.

    In the past, I have made no effort to promote any blog post.  I have assumed that having written and published a post was all that I needed to do.  WRONG!  A little extra effort can bring additional additional recognition and viewers.  Since this blog had been dormant for a number of months, 31 WBGB has already provided a remarkable “kick start” for me.  I needed it to get back to writing.  Thanks Tonia!

    Jul 212011
     
    This week I participated in DearMyrtle’s webinar on Google+. I particularly liked the collaborative style of leadership that Myrt demonstrated, inviting participants to become presenters (that is,. having their screens available to the rest of the participants while they demonstrated something they learned about Google+). Since I recently wrote a post about doing my genealogical research in collaboration with my son, I began to wonder about the differing ways that we collaborate as genealogists / family historians.  Here are some my favorites:
    1. One-on-One Collaboration  (our collaborative research benefits both of us)  –  My introduction to genealogy came through collaboration. Before I was interested in genealogy, my 1st cousin, once removed, allowed me to copy his Brenner Notebook.  When the genealogy “bug” bit me, his work laid a foundation for my research.  Early on, my brother-in-law and I shared data back and forth.  He provided most of the initial data for my wife’s lineage.  In the past couple of years, I have been able to collaborate with a number of people; my thanks to them:    Mary Anna and Miriam Bode (telling the stories behind Dana’s Brenner Notebook); John Boyer (Weaver, Gregg, and Boyer research); David Brenner (Brenner and Van Fossan research); Arlene Manale (Brenner research); Deb Williams (Messerall family Bible); Ernest Schumacher (Venninger research); Allen Frederickson (Cole research); and, of course, my son, Russ (the focus of my post, “Collaborative Genealogy”).
    2. Insight Collaboration  (I glean ideas from others that spark new ideas for me)  –  I regularly scan 94 genealogy blogs, picking up ideas and suggestions that inform my work.  a couple of weeks ago, I read a post that directed me to Tonia’s Roots blog.  She issued an invitation: “Then join me as I spend the next 31 weeks putting into practice tips and tricks from ProBlogger, Darren Rowse.”  She provides a summary of ideas from Rowse’s ebook and suggests a challenge task for the week.  This blog post is a part of response to week’s 3′s challenge:  “#31WBGB: Promote a Blog Post.”  
    3. Reflective Collaboration   (your thoughts + my thoughts can lead to better thinking)  –  Reflective Collaboration is more interactive than Insight Collaboration.        Comments on blog posts and social networking (Facebook, Google+, GenealogyWise, et al) all provide ways of sharing ideas. Sometimes focused on solving a particular problem;  here brainstorming can help break down brick walls.  There has been a lot of Reflective Collaboration in the past couple of years about source and citations.  One benefit of having a tech-savvy son, is that we regularly think through the intersection of genealogical research and technology.  Our private research WIKI has helped us map out our priorities and goals.
    4. Teaching/Learning Collaboration  (I learn from your experience as it informs and shapes my practice)  –  my skills have been sharpened and expanded by many within the genealogical community.  As a user of RootsMagic 4, I have appreciated Bruce Buzbee’s webinars. They have expanded my understanding and use of my RootsMagic software.  I have just started the NGS American Genealogy: Home Study Course.  (Actually, I have purchased it and have it loaded onto my computer; but I haven’t proceed beyond lesson one.)  I subscribe to Michael John Neill’s Casefile Clues.   (They provide insight into high quality genealogical research and decision-making.)  Thomas MacEntee’s “Building a Research Toolbox,” provided me with help in organizing my Google Bookmarks so as to provide quick links to important online research sites.  Genealogy conferences (I attended last year’s Midwest Family History Expo and am bummed that I will have to miss out of this year’s event.)
    5. Professional Collaboration  (your research becomes me)   I have not yet used the services of a professonal genealogist.  The time is coming near, however, when I will probably avail myself of such research services.  The TV show, Who Do You Think You Are has provided a brief glimpse into collaboration with professional genealogists.
    6. “Pay It Forward” Collaboration  (your “grunt work” facilitates my research)  — a significant amount volunteer work is done by genealogists for other genealogists.   RAOGK (Random Acts of Genealogical Kindness) provides free genealogical research by “volunteers [who] take time to do everything from looking up courthouse records to taking pictures of tombstones.”  Last month I decided to “pay it forward.”  I signed up to be an indexer for FamilySearch.  Today I indexed my 1300th name  (records include: US Census, Church of England baptismal records, county marriage records in 4 different states, WWII draft registrations, and will books).  I not only feel good about contributing, but I suspect I may be a little more tolerant when I find that one of my ancestors has been inaccurately indexed.  I heartily recommend indexing records as a way to “pay it forward.”

     How do you collaborate with others?  What does your genealogical collaboration look like?  I’d be interested in hearing from you. 

      Jul 162011
       

      I decided to join in Randy Seaver’s Saturday Night Genealogy Fun:

      1. List your 16 great-great-grandparents with their birth, death and marriage data (dates and places).
      2. Determine the countries (or states) that these ancestors lived in at their birth and at their death.
      3. For extra credit, go make a “Heritage Pie” chart for the country of origin (birth place) for these 16 ancestors.

      Here is the data that I have on my gg-grandparents:

      16. John Brenner, son of Georg Frederick Brenner and Johanna Catarina Venniner was born on 10 February 1836 in Adelshofen, Baden.  He died 28 September 1909 in Youngstown, Mahoning, Ohio, United States.  He and Catharine Welk were married on 1 October 1861 in either Columbiana, Ohio, United States or Mt. Jackson, Lawrence, Pennsylvania, United States.

      17. Catharine Welk, daughter of Anthony Welk and Catherine Crumrine was born on 29 June 1841 in Youngstown, Mahoning, Ohio, United States. She died 20 March 1915 in Youngstown, Mahoning, Ohio, United States.

      18. George Washington Cole, son of Encer Cole and Elizabeth Schaffer was born on 24 June 1834 in Columbiana, Ohio, United States. He died 3 July 1895 in Beaver Township, Mahoning, Ohio, United States.   He and Sarah Renkenberger were married about 1854 in Columbiana, Ohio, United States.

      19. Sarah A. Renkenberger, daughter of Johannes Renkenberger and Elizabeth Sheely, was born on 15 January 1834 in Ohio, United States.  She died on 21 February 1906 in Mahoning, Ohio, United States.

      20. Carl O. Mieding was born in Germany.  He and Adele Schaar were married in Germany. 

      21. Adele Schaar was born in May 1816 in Germany.   She died after 1900, probably in Rochester, Monroe, New York, United States.

      22. John Messerall, son of Aaron D. Messerall and Sarah ???,  was born in March 1828 in Pennsylvania, United States.  He died after 1900 (probably in Crawford County, Pennsylvania, United States).  He and Susanna Catherine Shoemaker were married on 13 June 1850 in Pennsylvania, United States.

      23. Susanna Catherine Shoemaker was born on 6 October 1831 in Pennsylvania.  She died on 23 March 1895 at Conchranton, Crawford, Pennsylvania, United States.

      24. Abraham Deeter was born in Pennsylvania, United States.  He and Barbara ??? were married in Ohio in 1831.

      25. Barbara (Deeter) was born in 1811 in Ohio, United States.

      26. Aaron B Knepper was born in January 1841 in Ohio.  He died after 1910, probably in Fairfield, Ohio, United States.  He and Sarah Van Arsdale were probably married in Lawrence, Tennessee, United States.

      27. Sarah Van Arsdale: born in February 1840 in Basil Township, Fairfield, Ohio, United States.  She died after 1910, probably in Fairfield, Ohio, United States.

      28. John A. Smith, son of Richard Smith and Catherine Albright, was born on 22 August 1828 in Pennsylvania, United States.  He and Amelia Catherine Boyer were married in Dayton, Montgomery, Ohio, United States, about 1882.  He died on 7 April 1910 in Dayton, Montgomery, Ohio, United States.

      29. Amelia Catherine Boyer, daughter of Joshua Boyer and Susana Buck, was born on 3 November 1829 in Pennsylvania,United States.  She died on 10 February 1917 in Dayton, Montgomery, Ohio, United States.

      30. Jacob Bartle (Barthel) was born about 1832 in Germany. 

      31. Jane (Bartle).

      I created the following pie chart for birth places for my gg-grandparents using the free tool at Kids Zone.

      Jul 112011
       

      Dean Richardson at  Genlighten News raised two interesting questions about collaborative genealogy:  “Would you get more genealogy research done faster if you could ‘partner’ with a fellow genealogist on a particular task? Would the collaborative product be of any higher quality?”    He concluded by saying:  “I’d love to hear stories of how it works (or doesn’t work) for you.”

      After responding to Dean, I received a follow-up from Cyndy at Genlighten.  She commented: “It seems like your reply shouldn’t just be archived into gmail oblivion. I see that you blog. (Yes. ‘GeneaPopPop’ Googles.) Have you mentioned your project there?”    So, here is my original response to Dean…  a brief description of my collaboration with my son.

      Dean,
      In your latest Genlighten News, you raised questions about “genealogists working side-by-side on the same project.” 

      In a sense my son and I have been doing that for the past 4 or 5 years.  I am retired and a hobby genealogist; my son is a computer programmer.  While we use RootsMagic 4 as our desktop software, our collaborative efforts are more oriented to our online presence.  He is the web master and technology consultant for our family genealogy project; I am the field researcher.  He maintains our website which is based on TNG – The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding – and has added a MediaWiki component that I use as my research journal and online storage.  Just recently he has revised our website to integrate Wiki pages within the TNG database.  I am presently working on adding source citations (and making older citations conform to the Elizabeth Shown Mills protocol) in RM4 and adding Wiki pages for key individuals on our TNG site.   Our “side-by-side” collaboration is primarily by telephone and email as he is in California and I am in Missouri.

      Our conversations have kept a healthy tension between our two perspectives and have necessitated clarifying our long-range intentions about building / modifying a system that is designed for collaboration, collecting and refining data, gathering and displaying stories, supporting research, and maintains current genealogical standards.

      In short, we keep each other sharp by sharing our different perspectives and finding mutually agreeable solutions. 

      The answer to your first question (“Would you get more genealogy research done faster if you could “partner” with a fellow genealogist on a particular task? “) is a resounding “NO!” for us.  Our collaboration slows down the process.   But, I am convinced that our experience answers your second question (“Would the collaborative product be of any higher quality?”) with a clear “Yes, it is.” 

      Jul 102011
       
      1. Maybe Later (an unexpected gift)
        Dana, my 1st cousin once removed visited us about 35 years ago. He was a genealogical aficionado. He showed me his Brenner Notebook. Although I was not interested in genealogy at the time, I intuitively knew that this was a precious resource. With his permission, I copied all his hand-drawn charts and his photographs of people and documents. The beginning of a genealogical journey… maybe later!
      2. It’s In the Box (an uninformed repository)
        As members of my extended family learned about my copy of Dana’s notebook, they began to send me bits of family lore. It all went into a drawer until the drawer filled up; then it all went into a box. I had become the family historian / genealogist by common consent. But I still had little interest in pursuing this venture… maybe later!
      3. Baby Steps – Organize (almost) and Share (uncritical, untutored genealogy)
        John, a former brother-in-law began to work on my wife’s family genealogy. Knowing that I had data on my family, John encouraged me to share that data with him and he would share his data with me. I purchased Family Tree Maker and never figured out what to do with all the bonus discs that came with it. I entered the data I had with no concern about its sources or accuracy. We rejoiced as the number of people in our combined data bases grew… has ‘later’ arrived?
      4. Partnering (beginning to think critically about genealogy)
        I retired five years ago. Now genealogy seemed a viable option. In addition, Russ, my son was interested in our working together. He serves as the technology expert and webmaster for our genealogical project; I am the field researcher. For the first time, I began to think critically about family history and genealogical. Russ and I had extended discussions about the design of a genealogical website, quality vis-à-vis quantity, security and privacy, et al. We built a website with a private ResearchWiki for conversations and data storage… ‘later’ has definitely arrived!
      5. Internet Giddiness   (genealogy’s version of the flu?)
        Throughout stages 3 & 4 I was beginning to learn how to find appropriate genealogical data on the internet. Yahoo, then Google, searches began to generate data for our family genealogical project. The quantum leap came when I subscribed to Ancestry.com. I was finding more data than I knew what to do with, and loving every minute of it. I was copying images and data and storing it (unorganized) on hard drives and memory sticks. Some of it even made it into my RootsMagic data base. Unfortunately, too much data and too little organization. Too much giddiness and too little logic. One of these days, I’ll have to get organized… maybe later!
      6. Blogging        (a courageous step for me)
        I’m not sure when or how I first became aware of geneabloggers, but I began reading genealogical blogs as a way to learn more about the discipline of genealogical research and the telling of family stories. There was a not-so-subtle message in a preponderance of the blogs I was reading: If you are serious about genealogy, you need to develop a blog. I wasn’t sure I was ready for blogging, but I bit the bullet and, on 4 February 2010, I opened “Stardust ‘n’ Roots.” This will be my 73rd post… no time for ‘later;’ only ‘now’ counts!
      7. Cite & Insight       (growing up, genealogically)
        As I began to get my data organized and as I read more and more blogs, I realized that the biggest stumbling block to my genealogical research was the lack of source citations. Dana’s Brenner Notebook (see #1, above) contained no source citations, except for photos of book title pages where other pages had been photographed as well. John’s database (see #3, above) had some good source citations, but also contained citations of many secondary or tertiary sources that could not be verified. In some cases, I had preserved information about the sources of the data, but those pieces of information were not always with the relevant data. Scraps of paper, loose file cards, and disorganized electronic files did not help. Organizational ‘limbo’ leads quickly to citation ‘hell.’ In order to bring some validity to my genealogical data, I have developed a fairly comprehensive data storage and retrieval system (increasingly, with citations of sources) in our Research Wiki (see #4, above)… our genealogical project is beginning to ‘grow up!’
      8. Give Back         (the helped becomes the helper)
        While blogging and internet presence of our genealogy database is a fairly passive way of giving back (the data is available, but others have to take the initiative to get it), I have just begun indexing records for FamilySearch. In my first couple of weeks, I have indexed over 800 individual records. I am finding the indexing process to be a) rewarding (knowing that others will be able to find information about their ancestors), b) frustrating (deciphering the handwriting of others can be a real challenge, and c) fun, flat-out fun… my ‘now’ is someone else’s ‘later!’
      Of course, the genealogical journey does not move unwaveringly through discrete stages – stage 2 does not begin where stage 1 ends. The stages overlap and each stage is potentially present in every other stage.

      This “list post” is challenge 2 in the “31 Weeks to Build a Better Blog.” For more information see Tonia’s Roots.