Feb 262011
 

As a college junior, while playing bridge with Sue Weaver; her sister, Judi; and Judi’s boyfriend, I was asked if I would fill in and preach the next day for a minister who had contracted laryngitis.  Having agreed to preach, I asked Sue if she would accompany me as I went to preach for the first time. The minister’s wife, along with her two daughters, picked up me and then Sue on Sunday morning.  The adventure had begun.  When we arrived at the church, a couple of men whisked me away to prepare me for leading the worship service.  I have to admit that I didn’t fully know what I was getting into, but I was game for trying.  I didn’t see Sue again before worship began.  Actually, as I entered the pulpit to begin worship, I looked around.  I had wanted to see Sue’s smiling face to help settle the butterflies that were beating the walls of my stomach.  But she was nowhere to be found.  That was distressing because it was a small church with only about 25 people in attendance.  I could not see Sue.  What had they done with her.  Our first date and I had lost her!  I didn’t ‘find’ her until the choir stood up to sing.  The minister’s wife was the organist; she and her daughters were the choir…   except, this morning, the choir had grown by 25%.  Sue was singing with them.  A smile came over my face and I began to relax a little.  The congregation may not have received a great sermon that morning, but their choir sounded better than ever.  I think they got their money’s worth that Sunday morning.

Sue and I were married on September 9th, 1962, at Riverside Methodist Church in Dayton, Ohio.  Rev. Warren Powell officiated.  Wiley Perry was my best man.  The rest of the wedding party was comprised of family members.  After a week’s honeymoon at a cottage on Lake Erie, Sue and I headed to New Jersey for seminary.  During seminary both Sue and I work for on of George Gallup’s organizations – no, not the Gallup poll; instead, his advertising and research company.  That company was a real blessing for us because, before long, Sue became pregnant with our first child.  Russell was born at Princeton General Hospital (before the days of Dr. House and Princeton-Plainsboro Hospital) in January, 1964.  He came into the world at 3:30 am.  When I left the hospital to go home, I found that there had been a major snow storm.  Our country lane had been plowed shut and I had no option but to return to Princeton.  I spent the rest of the night in George Gallup’s office, because he had the most comfortable sofa.  (Actually I learned that his office furnishings had, at one time, belonged to Woodrow Wilson.)  Fourteen months later, our second child, Cheryl, was born.  She chose a much better time to enter this world and, by this time, we were a little more prepared as parents. 

After seminary, I was called to be pastor of the Shreve (Ohio) Presbyterian Church.  Don’t know where Shreve is…   well it is about 5 miles from Big Prairie.  We were in the middle of Amish country.  It was not unusual to have Amish families drive their horse-drawn buggies down our street.  When we went to the local supermart, we always had to park across from the hitching post so Russ and Cheryl could watch the horses.  We came to realize that we were living in a rather insulated part of the country when we were at a Dairy Mart in near-by Wooster.  As a African-American man walked by the front of the car, Cheryl said, “Look, a chocolate man.”  We knew there and then that we had to provide a broader social experience for our children.  Previously we had been involved in multi-racial, urban churches.  Shreve was nothing like that.  After two years we returned to Princeton for a year’s Master of Theology study.  When we arrived at the apartment complex that was to be our home for the year, Cheryl met Kujo, a Bahamian boy her own age.  We noticed the contrast between his deep brown skin and her off-pink skin, a distinction that neither of them seemed to notice.

After concluding my Master of Theology, I served as minister of education for churches in Dayton. Ohio; Cincinnati, Ohio; and St. Louis, Missouri.  During our time in St. Louis, the children and I were to face the most significant and terrifying event of our lives.  Sue had finished a course of study at the Nursing School of Missouri Baptist Hospital and had served for a full year as a Registerd Nurse in the Intensive Care Unit of St. Luke’s Hospital.  She worked the 11 pm to 7 am shift.  After working on Saturday night, we went to church on Sunday morming, came home and had lunch.  Sue then went to bed.  When I went in to awaken her for work, I could not arouse her.  Her feet were stone cold and, initially, I could not detect any breathing.  Actually, she was still breathing, but it was very shallow.  A phone call brought the Life Squad and Sue arrive at the St. Luke’s ICU as a comatose patient rather than as a staff member.  She had a hypoglycemic (hyperinsulinism) attack while she slept.  Sue spent a month in Intensive Care (non-responsive), a week in a step-down unit (just beginning to respond), and five months in a rehabilitation center.  Her case was so far outside the norms that the doctors could make no prognosis for her future.  She could get better or not;  if she got better it could be a little or a lot…  no telling what would happen!

When we brought Sue home from the rehab center, we had the help of 39 women from the two churches I had served in St. Louis.  Each morning two women would come to the house to help; each afternoon, two others would arrive.  These women were the prayer-in-action of the churches.  Their presence helped Russ, Cheryl, and me to begin restoring some stability in our lives.  Furthermore, they helped begin the real process of Sue’s recovery.  Today, if you were to meet Sue, you probably would know what she had been through – how her life was almost snatched away from her and how she has recovered about 75% of her abilities.  We continue to refer to her as our “miracle child.”

Returning to Ohio seem to make sense in light of Sue’s beginning recovery.  After all, Ohio was home for both of us.  Our families were there and so were many, many fond memories.  Fortunately, I was asked to be the interim pastor for Calvin Presbyterian Church in Amelia, Ohio.  That congregation contained many friends who had been members of Mt. Washington Presbyterian Church (in near-by Cincinnati) when I served there as Minister of Education.  The year went fast and Sue’s recovery was moving along nicely – partly because of the friends we had re-connected with; partly because of nearness to family; and partly because of the congregation’s ability and willingness to wrap their collective arms around Sue and encourage her.  During my years at Loveland, I completed the course of study for the Doctor of Ministry degree at the Ecumenical Theological Seminary in Detroit, Michigan.

At the end of the year, I was called as pastor of the Loveland (Ohio) Presbyterian Church, where I serve for 12 years.  During that time, Sue’s recovery was completed.  And it was during that time that I truly became a pastor, utilizing my gifts for ministry.  Even thought there were some bumps in the road, the congregation and I both grew immensely during my ministry there.  And the experience prepared me for the next chapter in my life – serving as a regional judicatory executive for the Presbyterian Church.    I finished my ministry as Executive Presbyter for 12 years in the Missouri River Valley Presbytery (metropolitan Omaha, Nebraska, and 7 counties of southwest Iowa) and Interim Executive Presbyter for 2½ years for South Dakota Presbytery. 

After retiring Sue and I eventually moved to a retirement community in St. Charles, Missouri.  I began retirement with two primary activities – researching my family’s genealogical roots and fly fishing (and fly tying).  These pursuits have kept me busy and have provided a lot of enjoyment.  Lately, since our move to St. Charles, I have been re-united with a young pastor with whom I worked in my first Executive Presbyter position.  As pastor of the church we now attend, he has encouraged me to begin to build a new dimension to the congregation’s program of adult education – namely, a more progressive approach.  I can truly say that I am having a ball.  I could only wish that there were more hours in the day, so that I could accomplish more.  But, that is the benefit of retirement!  I can engage in those activities that I choose and I can structure them in a way that works for me…   and in a way that still leaves me time to be involved with my grandchildren – Olivia (6½) and Benjamin (4) .

Eric Ericson suggested that there are eight stages of psychological developmental stages through which we progress during our life.  The final stage is framed by the question:  “Has it all been worthwhile?”  I am currently in my 70th year.  Even though I may still have 15-20 years of life, I don’t have to wait to the end to answer Ericson’s question.  YES! Indeed it has (and continues to be) worthwhile!  Life is a blast!

[Next up:  My Dad, Donald George Brenner]

Feb 252011
 

As I begin the process of blogging my Ahnentafel, first up is the one person about whom I know the most – namely, myself.  I was born on September 16th, 1940, at the Northside Hospital in Youngstown, Ohio.  A copy of the hospital bill shows that Mom was charged $2 a day for the first two days and $2.50 a day for the next 10 days. Incidentals brought the total hospital bill to $39.92.  (What a deal!)  I was named Barthel Lee Brenner.  “Barthel” was the maiden name of Mom’s maternal grandmother (Emma Lavina [Barthel] Smith).  One of Mom’s brothers was named Barthel.  Mom has been very clear that I was not named after her brother, but simply because she liked the name (and, of course, because it kept another family name alive).  Mom couldn’t remember any particular reason for choosing “Lee” as a middle name except that it was simple and seemed to go with “Barthel.”

At the time of my birth, we lived at 125 E. Ravenwood Street in Youngstown.  This was previously the home of Grandma Brenner’s father (George Herman Mieding).  I have many fond memories of growing up there – not so much about the house itself, but more about the neighborhood where we kids played – the huge empty lot ball field across the street (since replaced by an elementary school connected with St. Dominic’s Parish); and, of course, the home of my best friend (Wiley Perry) directly across the street and next to the ball field.  In 1948 (?), Dad and two partners started up a electro-plating shop in Ashtabula, Ohio (about 60 miles north of Youngstown).  At that time we moved north from Youngstown to Ashtabula County.  We lived in a rented home across the street from Lake Erie.  The home was owned by .  They ran the grocery store next to our home.  In 1950 we moved into Ashtabula to West 35th Street.  Dad’s shop was about a block away and visible from our back yard.  Later on, 1956, we moved to 4003 Fargo Drive in Ashtabula Township. 

Two years later I graduated from Edgewood High School and then proceeded to Bowling Green State University.  I began in a pre-dentistry track (majoring in biology).  During my freshman year, while conducting an experiment in a quantitative analysis chemistry lab, Dr. Peggy Hurst came up behind me, observed over my shoulder for a few minutes, and then asked a question that was to change my academic pursuits.  “Mr. Brenner,” she asked with her deep, booming bass voice, “Is it really your intention to spend your life with your hands in other people’s mouths?”  Without blinking I answered immediately, “No, Dr. Hurst, it is not!”  At that point I changed my major to chemistry, intending to become a research chemist. 

Throughout my 4 years at Bowling Green I was very involved in The United Christian Fellowship, one of the oldest ecumenical campus ministries in this country.  Discussion groups, retreats, mission experiences, and occasional involvement in statewide and national student ministry associations helped share my growing faith.  During the middle of my Junior year, a group of us were working at a storefront church that was part of the Cleveland Inner-City Protestant Parish.  We stayed at the YMCA.  I happened to be rooming with Rev. Gene Davis, our UCF director.  That evening he asked another of those life changing questions:  “Bart, what are you going to do with your life after you graduate.”  Again, without hesitation, I answered “I intend to go to seminary and become a minister.”  I startled myself because I had never consciously thought about ministry before.  Obviously there had been a deep struggle within that I had not been aware of it until the words tumbled out of my mouth.  Many years later I would learn that I could trust my intuitions because they were deeply formed and often rather thoroughly considered.

A UCF retreat also provided occasion for meeting Susan Weaver (she was a freshman; I, a junior).  We were put together as bridge partners.  Not long after that retreat, Sue invited me to join her, her sister (Judi) and Judi’s boyfriend for a few rounds of bridge on Saturday afternoon.  We played at our UCF house.  While we were playing bridge, Rev. Will Power, associate director of UCF, asked me if I would be willing to preach the next day at a small Methodist church near Toledo.  The minister, who lived in Bowling Green, had contracted laryngitis.  His wife had checked everywhere trying to find a substitute.  Will Power suggested me.  I had never preached before, so the bridge game quickly ended so I could prepare a sermon (whatever that meant).  I asked Sue if she would accompany me the next morning.  She agreed.

[To Be Continued]

Feb 242011
 

Thomas MacEntee at geneabloggers.com has posted an interesting reflection (“The RootsTech Revolution – Woodstock or Waterloo?”) on the aftermath of RootsTech.  Thomas raises an important question:  will our Woodstock (“A bend in the road. A light in the tunnel. A happening”) become our Waterloo (not working “on our action plans, our methods of implementing what was learned [to turn] these concepts into actual products and services”)?

I did not attend RootsTech, but have been interested in the many, many blogs about the event and its effect on our genealogical sub-culture.  Thomas MacEntee’s post has caused me to reflect on what I see happening as a result of RootsTech.  I would agree that RootsTech seems to have been a demarcation point for contemporary genealogy.  I would describe the demarcation as being almost a paradigm shift.

Since I began blogging just over a year ago, there has been a rising tide of change in the genealogy world – the number of bloggers listed on Genealbloggers.com has almost doubled…  FamilySearch has radically shifted its profile as it continues to roll out a new web presence…  Ancestry.com continues to grow by acquiring subsidiary firms, as well as the public offering of its stock…  “Who Do You Think You Are?” has become a Friday night success in the US, now well into its second season…  BetterGedcom has brought genealogy practitioners together with genealogy technologists to seek an improved standard for sharing genealogical information…  there are increasing numbers of websites designed to help genealogists publish their family trees (with increased security)… 

It seems to me that the tension in genealogy has been between those who control access to genealogical information (Ancestry.com; Footnote.com; previous incarnation of FamilySearch; etc.] and the genealogical practitioner – from professional genealogists and family historians to hobbyists (who range from those mildly interested in tracing family lineages to those who have been bitten by the genealogy virus bug). 

Computer operating systems face a similar tension.  Microsoft Windows and Apple OS are top-down systems that have developed because the developers “know” what the user “needs.”  Microsoft and Apple have each gone their own separate ways, developing their own protocols and keeping their proprietary operating systems – that is, they control the system and sell it to you.  Developers of the software that runs within those systems must follow the protocols of the operating system.  The software programs that are developed for Microsoft and Apple are proprietary and usually must be purchased. 

There do exist alternatives to MSWindows and AppleOS.  These are radically different alternatives because they are Open Source systems, not proprietary ones.  The open source system best known to me is the Linux operating system.  I am not a computer programmer and I do not know programming code, but I have turned to Linux as my operating system of choice because it is open source.  Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source) includes the following statement about open source development:  “A main principle and practice of open source software development is peer production by bartering and collaboration.”  In the open source community “peers” may include corporate officers, program developers, vendors, and users.  As a user my input (together with that of other users and developers, etc.) has brought about changes in Linux operating systems and software programs that run within those systems.  Oh, Yes! Another nice thing about open source systems and software programs is that they tend to be free.

I think that the success of RootsTech is evidence that the genealogical practitioner is now a vital player (not just a consumer) in the continuing development of genealogy protocol and services.  While FamilySearch still is basically a top-down service, it has become much more responsive to open source “bartering and collaboration.”  This was best evidenced by the shift from an earlier abandoning of the gedcom standard to the announcement at RootsTech that FamilySearch will be reviewing and updating the gedcom standard.  The basic question to be resolved is “Will the review and updating include broad-based input and involvement by the community of genealogical practitioners.  Another way to ask the question:  “Will the work of the BetterGedcom group (organized, as I understand it, primarily by genealogical practitioners) be taken into account in any updating (or replacement) of gedcom standards by FamilySearch, FamilyTreeMaker, Legacy, RootsMagic, et al?

So, it seems to me that the genealogical ‘world’ is moving toward a better balance between the top-down providers (vendors and data providers) and the bottom-up practitioners (genealogists and family historians).  One important implication of this movement toward “bartering and collaboration” is that, if we expect to attract more younger genealogists, the field of genealogy will have to continue to move toward more collaboration.  Social networking is part of such a move.  Giving practitioners a greater voice in accessing and processing vital genealogical information is another part of such a move.  Let’s hope that we have begun that move in a significant way – a way that will not be reversed.

Feb 242011
 

I have been engaged in a massive project of re-organizing my digital filing system.  This has necessitated my scouring the hard drives of my various computers, external hard drives, USB memory sticks, our research wiki, and the file storage system of our website.  While I was growing toward a coherent filing system, I had too many duplicate files spread over all my storage media.  I have not completed the task, but I have the feeling that I am beginning to gain some control over my files.  There is more work to be done and I will persevere until it is completed.  

I have also been tidying up my genealogy database in RootsMagic 4.  I have two primary goals in this task.  First, I want to provide source citations for as many individuals and events as possible.  My original research has been lacking in this area.  Over the past year I have been more attentive to sources, but my process of getting source citation from research to database has been spotty.  Second, I am cleaning up the various lists (sources, repositories, addresses, places, etc.) that RootsMagic 4 makes possible.  I have split my main database into eight separate databases (one for each of the great-grandparent lines of my wife and myself.) and am tracking myself through them. 

In the meantime, I have been neglecting my research and my blog.  I don’t want to re-energize my research until my files are in better order.    No sense throwing more confusion into the system.  (I have to admit that research is more fun than cleaning files, so I periodically sidetrack myself with an online search.)  I have decided that the best thing for me to do at this point is return to my blog.

I have decided to focus my blog posts by working my way through my Ahnentafel.  I will start with myself; move to each of my parents; continue on with each of my grandparents; etc.   As I write about each individual, I will a) identify and assess the information I have concerning them, b) make note of missing information and any research leads that I may have (as well as new directions for my research), c) tell one or more stories I have gleaned about each individual, and d) post pictures where I have them.

I hope to present one individual a week until I have worked through posts Generation 5 (my great-grandparents).  I will publish multiple post where necessary.